57. Elution Behavior of Tc and Re through a Tc-selective Chromatographic
Resin Column
Shigeo Uchida and Keiko Tagami
Keywords: technetium, rhenium, yield tracer, ICP-MS,
elution behavior
Technetium-99 has been determined in environmental samples to understand the
behavior of Tc in the environment. To measure 99Tc in environmental
samples, a chemical separation and purification of the nuclide from interfering
elements is required, because the concentration in the environment
is very low. There are several yield tracers for 99Tc measurement,
such as 95mTc, 99mTc, 97Tc and Re. From a practical
point of view, Re is a convenient yield monitor because it is cheap and has no
interference on 99Tc counting by ICP-MS. In this study, we performed
tracer experiments to compare the elution behavior of Tc and Re through a Tc-selective
chromatographic resin (TEVA resin) column under various conditions.
Two hundred and fifty mL of pure water or tap water were adjusted to 0.1 M
HNO3 with conc. HNO3. The solution spiked with 99Tc
and Re was passed through the column. Next, the column was washed with 40 mL of
1, 2, 4 or 8M HNO3. Finally, Tc and Re retained in the column were
stripped with 10 mL (5 mL x 2) of 12M HNO3. The loading solutions and
the nitric acid solutions were allowed to drain completely and the eluate was
collected into polyethylene vials for the measurement of 99Tc and Re
by ICP-MS.
The elution behaviors of Tc and Re are listed in Table 12. The recovery was
defined as the ratio of the amount of the nuclide in each fraction to that in
the sample solution. There was no difference in each nuclide's behavior between
pure water and tap water. When the solution was introduced into the column, Re
was extracted onto the resin together with Tc. Then the column was washed with
8 mL of 1, 2, 4 or 8M HNO3 for 5 times (total 40 mL). When 1M HNO3
was used, Re remained on the resin as well as Tc did. With 2M HNO3,
Re was gradually removed and it was found in the third 8 mL wash fraction but
Tc was not found in the eluates. When solutions of higher nitric acid concentrations
than 4M HNO3 were used, Re was removed from the resin easily and was
found in the first 8 mL.
Since the distribution coefficient of Re between the resin and nitric acid
solution was almost half the value of that of Tc over a wide range of nitric acid
concentrations from 0.1M to 8M HNO3, Re could be removed with less
than 40 mL of 2M HNO3. Thus, when the TEVA resin is applied for Re
separation, less than 1M HNO3 should be used for washing the column
to avoid Re losses. For stripping, as seen in Table 12, with 8 mL of 8M HNO3
both Tc and Re can be completely removed from the resin.
From the results, it was concluded that the TEVA resin showed high selectivity
for Re, similar to that for Tc. When concentrations of nitric acid solutions of
1M and 8M were used for washing and stripping, respectively, the elution behaviors
of Tc and Re were the same. This indicated that Re could be used as a yield tracer
for Tc in environmental water samples.
| Table 12. |
Recoveries of 99Tc and Re in wash and strip solutions when nitric
acid concentrations for wash were 1, 2, 4 and 8M. The sample solutions were pure
water and tap water. |
| Pure water |
Volume
(mL) |
Tc-99 |
Re-185 |
|
|
|
| Load* |
| Wash-1 |
| Wash-2 |
| Wash-3 |
| Wash-4 |
| Wash-5 |
| Strip-1** |
| Strip-2** |
|
|
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.98 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
| 1.00 |
1.04 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
| 0.02 |
- |
- |
- |
|
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.50 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.39 |
- |
- |
| 0.98 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
- |
- |
- |
|
| Tap water |
Volume
(mL) |
Tc-99 |
Re-185 |
|
|
|
| Load* |
| Wash-1 |
| Wash-2 |
| Wash-3 |
| Wash-4 |
| Wash-5 |
| Strip-1** |
| Strip-2** |
|
|
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.98 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.95 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
- |
- |
| 0.95 |
1.03 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
| 0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.45 |
- |
- |
| 0.00 |
0.39 |
- |
- |
| 1.05 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
| (Notes) |
*: The acidity of the loading solution was 0.1M HNO3. **: The 12M
HNO3 was used as strip solution. |
|
-: Not measured. |
[Back to index]